Let the Clean Tech Bubble Begin!

August 11, 2008

After a miserable H1 2008 for exits, Clean Tech companies are breaking the ice and filing for IPOs, including a number from the East Coast:

It’s nice to see the activity. I’m still taken aback by how quickly things ground to a halt (graph from this XConomy Article):

The part stopped abruptly in 2008.

The part stopped abruptly in 2008.


Go West

July 9, 2008

There’s a Globe article on the founders of Paragon Lake (who just raised $5.8m series A) and Highland’s Summer@Highland Program: Incubator Polishes Gem of an Idea. It’s great to see these kinds of programs. I’ve always felt that the East Coast is a great community for entrepreneurs who are somewhat established, but it can be hard to get into for people who are fresh out of school with no ties to the industry. This this means many of the great entrepreneurs that come out of MIT, Harvard, and other schools end up going West; Facebook being a recent, very visible example (and Microsoft being a much older one).

In a somewhat outdated study looking at the semiconductor industry by BankBoston (that alone places it in the three year span post-Baybank and pre-Fleet), the authors found that most MIT-based founders created their firms elsewhere:

More than 50% of the MIT-related companies are located outside the Northeast. These companies have a major presence in the San Francisco Bay Area (Silicon Valley). The five states benefiting most from MIT-related jobs are California (162,000), Massachusetts (125,000), Texas (84,000), New Jersey (34,000), and Pennsylvania (21,000).

It does seem like the community has been changing and the stodgy attitude is starting to change and become more inclusive. There’s more and more completely open forums and meetups (WebInno et al) which are being embraced and a more open community, in general of entrepreneurs.


Mass First in 2008 Science and Tech Index

July 1, 2008

Massachusetts was the top state in the Milken Institutes’s 2008 Science and Technology Index.  The top five are:

  1. Massachusetts
  2. Maryland
  3. Colorado
  4. California
  5. Washington

It was also #1 in their last two studies, from 2004 and 2002 (no idea why they didn’t do one in ‘06).  From their interactive maps, the two big categories they use which Mass cleans up in are per-capita small business grants (SBIR and STTR) and the percentage of engineers and scientists in the workforce.


East Coast - West Coast

May 1, 2008

With a blog named “Right Coast Tech”, I feel compelled to comment on XConomy’s article Is Boston Venture System is Losing More Ground to the West Coast ?

This is not the first and won’t be last “East Coast Vs. West Coast Venture Scene” article. The problem I have with all of them is that they’re answering the wrong question.

Strawberry is Much Better

They remind me of the Boston-New York arguments that inevitably happen when a New Yorker comes to Boston. New York has much better nightlife, is much bigger, and has better bagels. These are facts, not arguments and miss the point. If you care a lot about bagels, clubbing until 3 am, and being surrounded by 8 million people, then you’re going to like New York. Boston has more history, is a short drive to the suburbs and nature, and is much smaller. If you like walking the Freedom Trail, hiking in the mountains, smaller cities, and not being surrounded by tons of people all of the time, you’ll like Boston. Arguing about which city is “better” is as interesting as arguing over chocolate or vanilla ice cream.

The West Coast VC ecosystem is bigger, which means you’re exposed to many more ideas, people, and VCs. That’s a fact. There’s pros and cons to this. Having access to many more co-founders, employees, and potential investors is a benefit. On the other hand, you’re competing with many more entrepreneurs. Additionally, being exposed to more ideas is not necessarily better. A case can be made for over-stimulation. An entrepreneur only needs one idea. Having 3,000 doesn’t help and, in fact, it’s likely to hurt. Warren Buffet lives in Omaha for a reason. That said, there’s plenty of other great investors who thrive in New York.

It’s Irrelevant as All Ice Cream Is Good

An entrepreneur should use an approach for networking, raising money, and hiring that fits the ecosystem in which she’s operating. But that’s true of a number of variables besides size. Like the economy for example: if times are tough, one should be more conservative in financial projections of burnrate and when to raise capital.

More importantly, a good idea and a good team is going to do great things in any venture ecosystem in any economic time. If Boston’s scene has no growth over the next 5 years, it will still be good for a variety of reasons and still a great place to launch a venture.


Article on Georges Doriot, the Original VC

April 15, 2008

The Globe is running an interesting article on Georges Doriot, entitled Venture capital’s grandfather that’s an interesting read. It mentions the book Creative Capital by Spencer Ante which is in my ever growing list of books to read.

The startup world moves so quickly that I really enjoy pieces like this one which put what we do into a larger historical context. It’s useful to keep in mind that the world has only worked the way it does for a very small period of time.  And it’s unlikely to keep working that way for much longer.

Ten years from now, it’s possible most of the traditional, stodgy VCs will have been replaced by an ecosystem of startup development ‘Microfunds’ like Y Combinator, Tech Stars, or Highland’s Summer at Highland. Or maybe not. Hard to predict exactly what will happen, but it’s useful to remember how unpredictable our industry is, even at its most basic level.


Angel Outlook Good for 2008

March 26, 2008

XConomy.com is running an article about angel groups having a positive outlook for 2008. It’s nice to hear confirmation that in spite of much of the rest of the economy failing off the rails, the startup world is still humming along. Though the pessimist in me is compelled to point out that startup investment usually lags the rest of the economy and probably wouldn’t feel the effects for another 6-12 months.


2007 in Review

January 20, 2008

Looking back, this was a great year in technology.  In Boston, it was a banner year for IPOs:

Salary.com (SLRY) 2/14/2007
EnerNOC (ENOC) 5/17/2007
TechTarget (TTGT) 6/4/2007
Starent Networks (STAR) 6/5/2007
Bridgeline Software (BLSW) 6/28/2007
BladeLogic (BLOG) 7/24/2007
Netezza (NZ) 7/18/2007
Virtusa (VRTU) 8/2/2007
VM Ware (VMW) 8/14/2007
Athena Health (ATHN) 9/19/2007
Constant Contact (CTCT) 10/3/2007
Double-Take Software (DBTK) 12/15/2007

There were also pile of acquisitions, including some for big dollars like Equal Logic ($1.4B Dell) and Health Dialog ($775m - BUPA).  Venture funding continues to be up, but is still well below it’s peak in 2001.  And close to $35 Billion was raised by venture funds in 2007, indicating that investors still believe it’s a good bet.